Bangkok: Phumtham Vejjayachai, Thailand's Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister, has reiterated that Koh Kood remains firmly under Thai sovereignty, addressing recent discussions and misunderstandings about the island's status. Speaking before a coalition party leaders' meeting at the Thai Khu Fah Building, Phumtham clarified that the Abhisit government never officially canceled any agreements related to the island, as no Cabinet resolution was made on the matter. According to Thai News Agency, Phumtham explained that while there are ongoing talks within the coalition parties, the focus remains on various work issues that arise during their regular meetings, which are scheduled every one to two weeks. He emphasized that the discussion of Koh Kood is not on the agenda, as the island is indisputably part of Thailand's Trat Province, confirmed by historical treaties and recent military presence. Phumtham also addressed rumors surrounding MOU 44, stating that although it was reportedly canceled during Abhi sit Vejjajiva's tenure, no official action was taken due to the absence of a Cabinet resolution. The MOU involves complex issues that remain unresolved, but it is unrelated to Koh Kood's sovereignty. The Deputy Prime Minister highlighted that military actions in the region are solely for safeguarding Thailand's sovereignty and are free from political influences. In addressing the pending discussions on MOU 44, Phumtham noted that the maritime and territorial benefits are already under Thailand's jurisdiction, and the current border demarcations are aligned with historical agreements. He questioned the motives behind the recent movements to challenge Koh Kood's status, reaffirming that there have been no government discussions to alter its recognized standing. Phumtham concluded by questioning the rationale behind calls to cancel agreements that have not been officially enacted, insisting that Koh Kood has always belonged to Thailand and that the government has never initiated any actions to change this stat us. He urged clarity from those raising the issue, suggesting their intentions might be to create unnecessary controversies.